Fund Manager Changes: Does It Really Matter to Your Mutual Fund Returns?
Every now and then, investors receive an update that sounds more alarming than it actually is:
The fund manager of your mutual fund scheme has changed.
For many investors, this immediately raises uncomfortable questions.
Should I exit the fund?
Was the earlier performance only because of this person?
Will the new manager take unnecessary risks?
With several AMCs, including SBI Mutual Fund, announcing fund manager changes in early 2026, these questions have once again come to the forefront.
The truth is, fund manager changes are neither rare nor automatically negative. In fact, they are a normal part of a growing and maturing mutual fund industry. What matters is how investors interpret and respond to them.
.png)
What Does a Fund Manager Change Actually Mean?
At the most basic level, a fund manager change means that the responsibility for managing the portfolio moves from one individual to another.
But this is where many investors stop digging and that’s where confusion begins.
Mutual funds, especially at large AMCs, are not run by lone individuals making instinctive calls. They are supported by:
-
Dedicated research teams
-
Clearly defined investment processes
-
Risk management frameworks
-
Internal review and oversight committees
The fund manager is important but they operate within a system.
This distinction is crucial. A well-designed process ensures that even when people change, the philosophy and discipline remain intact.
The “Star Fund Manager” Myth
One reason fund manager changes feel unsettling is because we tend to associate success with individuals.
Financial media often reinforces this by highlighting “star fund managers” and attributing returns to them personally. While talent and experience absolutely matter, this view can be misleading.
Broadly speaking, fund managers fall into two categories:
Process-Driven Managers
These managers:
-
Follow a clearly articulated investment philosophy
-
Make gradual, well-researched changes
-
Prioritise consistency over bold bets
When such managers change, the impact on the fund is often limited.
Conviction-Driven or “Star” Managers
These managers:
-
Have strong personal views
-
May run concentrated portfolios
-
Can deliver outstanding performance but with higher variability
In these cases, a manager change can lead to a visible shift in portfolio behaviour over time.
Neither approach is right or wrong. But understanding which type your fund follows helps you interpret a manager change calmly.
How Soon Does a Fund Manager Change Affect Performance?
One of the most common misconceptions is that performance will change immediately after a fund manager exits.
In reality, this almost never happens.
Portfolios are not turned upside down overnight. Holdings are transitioned gradually, and many stocks may remain unchanged for months. It often takes six to twelve months sometimes longer for a new manager’s style to fully reflect in performance.
Short-term fluctuations after a change are usually driven by market movements, not managerial decisions.
As Warren Buffett once observed:
In the short run, the market is a voting machine. In the long run, it is a weighing machine.
The same logic applies here. Immediate reactions rarely tell the real story.
When Fund Manager Changes Have Mattered
There have been instances in the Indian mutual fund industry where:
-
A long-tenured fund manager exited
-
The successor adopted a noticeably different investment style
-
Over the next one to two years, performance diverged meaningfully from the past
In such cases, the change wasn’t negative by default but it required investors to re-evaluate whether the fund still suited their risk profile and goals.
On the other hand, there are also many examples especially among large-cap and index-oriented funds where:
-
Fund managers changed multiple times
-
Yet performance remained largely consistent
The reason?
A strong underlying process and disciplined execution.
When Should Investors Actually Pay Attention?
A fund manager change is not a trigger to panic, but it is a reason to observe.
Investors should take closer notice if they see:
-
A sudden increase in portfolio churn
-
A clear shift in risk profile
-
Deviation from the fund’s stated investment mandate
-
Frequent fund manager changes within a short period
These are signals to review the fund, not abandon it impulsively.
What Is the Right Response for Investors?
The most sensible approach is also the simplest:
Do nothing immediately.
Give the new manager time. Track the fund over a few review cycles. Compare behaviour not just returns with what the fund historically stood for.
Returns can fluctuate for many reasons. A change in philosophy or risk discipline is what truly matters.
The Bigger Lesson: Process Outlasts People
Experienced investors eventually realise that sustainable performance comes from process, not personality.
This is why:
-
Index funds remain unaffected by manager changes
-
Large, process-driven AMCs show consistency over decades
-
Long-term investors benefit from staying patient
Fund manager changes are part of a living, evolving industry. They are not red flags by default, they are just only data points.
Final Thoughts
A fund manager change should prompt curiosity, not fear.
Instead of asking:
Should I exit because the fund manager has changed?
A better question is:
Has anything fundamental about this fund changed?
When investors focus on philosophy, process, and alignment with goals, rather than headlines, they make calmer and far more rewarding decisions over time.
Comments
Post a Comment